•   Guest, please read these simple rules before you request:

    1. Before requesting, always search with the FULL release name in the search box. The "is this being discussed" window is not a search engine.
    2. You can make up to 10 requests (including RE-UP) per day (24h) to avoid abuse.
    3. Include a link with info about the release, typically from srrDB or PreDB.
    4. Once your request has been fulfilled, edit the thread and mark it with the prefix "FILLED".
    5. Show your gratitude by thanking the user with a Like, do not reply with "thank you" messages.
    6. If a link is dead, leave a reply asking for a re-up instead of making a new topic.
    7. Fillers should prioritize user-friendly hosts with decent retention when possible.

      Updated on 2025-12-26.

FILLED The_Beatles-The_Beatles-2CD-FLAC-1987-ERP

aGGyunit

Forum Admin
Staff member
Joined
30 Apr 2023
Messages
11,759
Appreciation score
18,819
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

From PreDB:
1784516010036.png

@Menchenωaffe : it was nuked due to having MP3 files instead of FLAC files. The release is as it was PREd by ERP.

Hence they released
The_Beatles-The_Beatles-REPACK-2CD-FLAC-1987-ERP
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


from nfo:
"Repack for The_Beatles-The_Beatles-2CD-FLAC-1987-ERP which doesnt have flac files. Update your ERP archive and keep it tidy."
 

mv24280

LEGEND
Joined
29 Sep 2024
Messages
2,505
Appreciation score
4,128
Surely they could've opted for a DIR FIX for both releases? Remove "-FLAC" from the release containing MP3s and add "-FLAC" to the release containing the FLACs.
All they did was mix up the release names. The contents weren't altered in any way.
 

aGGyunit

Forum Admin
Staff member
Joined
30 Apr 2023
Messages
11,759
Appreciation score
18,819
Surely they could've opted for a DIR FIX for both releases? Remove "-FLAC" from the release containing MP3s and add "-FLAC" to the release containing the FLACs.
All they did was mix up the release names. The contents weren't altered in any way.

Not allowed under the rules:
1784590769135.png

REPACK is the only solution according to the rules.

If they had any form of quality control this should have never been PRED in the first place.
 
Top Bottom